Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29143076›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2018

Magnetic resonance elastography: beyond liver fibrosis-a case-based pictorial review.

Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Michael L Wells, Frank H Miller, Kartik S Jhaveri, Alvin C Silva, Bachir Taouli, Richard L Ehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MR Elastography: Practical Questions, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stiffness is associated with hepatic stellate cell heterogeneity during liver fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sudhakar K VenkateshDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200, First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Venkatesh.Sudhakar@mayo.edu.
Michael L WellsDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200, First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Frank H MillerDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kartik S JhaveriJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alvin C SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Bachir TaouliNYU Medical College, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Richard L EhmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200, First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR37EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR01EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2003 to 2013
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001981NIBIB NIH HHS R37 EB001981NIH HHS EB001981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has been introduced for clinical evaluation of liver fibrosis for nearly a decade. MRE has proven to be a robust and accurate technique for diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. As clinical experience with MRE grows, the possible role in evaluation of other diffuse and focal disorders of liver is emerging. Stiffness maps provide an opportunity to evaluate mechanical properties within a large volume of liver tissue. This enables appreciation of spatial heterogeneity of stiffness. Stiffness maps may reveal characteristic and differentiating features of chronic liver diseases and focal liver lesions and therefore provide useful information for clinical management. The objective of this pictorial review is to recapture the essentials of MRE technique and illustrate with examples, the utility of stiffness maps in other chronic liver disorders and focal liver lesions.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAcute hepatitisAmyloidosisCongestive hepatopathyDiffuse liver diseasesElastogramsFocal liver lesionsInfiltrative diseasesPrimary sclerosing cholangitisSarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID29143076
PMCPMC6731769
OpenAlexW2768127169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.