ReviewCureus2017
Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Antiarrhythmic Medications: A Review of Current Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Pharmaceutical biology · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of amiodarone, diltiazem, or both to achieve strict heart rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- PPDPF preserves integrity of proximal tubule by modulating NMNAT activity in chronic kidney diseases.Science advances · 2025Article
- A review of gut failure as a cause and consequence of critical illness.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Emerging Anti-Inflammatory Attributes of Curcumin: A Novel Paradigm and Ameliorative Attributes for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.Current rheumatology reviews · 2025Review
- Factors associated with serious abdominal conditions in geriatric patients visiting the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Amiodarone treatment in cats: evaluation of indications, adverse effects, and survival outcomes.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Review
- Novel CuO/MnScientific reports · 2021Article
- Drug Repurposing on G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using a Computational Profiling Approach.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Tissue-specific genetic features inform prediction of drug side effects in clinical trials.Science advances · 2020Article
- Digoxin in Atrial Fibrillation: An Old Topic Revisited.Current cardiology reviews · 2020Review
- Clindamycin-Induced Esophageal Injury: Is It an Underdiagnosed Entity?Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly prescribed cardiac drugs. Due to their receptor mimicry with several of the gastrointestinal tract receptors, they can frequently lead to gastrointestinal side effects. These side effects are the most common reasons for discontinuation of these drugs by the patients. Knowledge of these side effects is important for clinicians that manage antiarrhythmic drugs. This review focuses on the gastrointestinal side effects of these drugs and provides a detailed up-to-date literature review of the side effects of these drugs. The review provides case reports reported in the literature as well as possible mechanisms that lead to gastrointestinal side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.