ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2017
Microvascular Decompression for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: Clinical Analyses of 30 Cases.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microvascular decompression in glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Pooled it
- Current advances in the surgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Targeting neurovascular conflict in atypical vagal-glossopharyngeal neuralgia: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Compression Syndromes of Cranial Nerves: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Management.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and treatment pitfalls in glossopharyngeal neuralgia: evidence from a case series.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Augmented reality-assisted microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Case report: Significance of the large rhomboid lip in microvascular decompression: insights from two clinical cases.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023Article
- Glossopharyngeal and vagoglossopharyngeal neuralgia: Long-term surgical outcomes in a single institution.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Routine postoperative admission to the neurocritical intensive care unit after microvascular decompression: necessary or can it be abandoned?Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- Curious case of neck pain caused by glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Management of recurrent glossopharyngeal neuralgia after a failed microvascular decompression.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- Endoscopic microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- Salvage gamma knife surgery for recurrent glossopharyngeal neuralgia following microvascular decompression: a retrospective case series.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- The Long-Term Outcome of CT-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Idiopathic Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Multi-Center Case Series.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe present our experience of microvascular decompression (MVD) for glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) and evaluate the postoperative outcomes in accordance with four different operative techniques during MVD.
methodsIn total, 30 patients with intractable primary typical GPN who underwent MVD without rhizotomy and were followed for more than 2 years were included in the analysis. Each MVD was performed using one of four different surgical techniques: interposition of Teflon pieces, transposition of offending vessels using Teflon pieces, transposition of offending vessels using a fibrin-glue-coated Teflon sling, and removal of offending veins.
resultsThe posterior inferior cerebellar artery was responsible for neurovascular compression in 27 of 30 (90%) patients, either by itself or in combination with other vessels. The location of compression on the glossopharyngeal nerve varied; the root entry zone (REZ) only (63.3%) was most common, followed by both the REZ and distal portion (26.7%) and the distal portion alone (10.0%). In terms of detailed surgical techniques during MVD, the offending vessels were transposed in 24 (80%) patients, either using additional insulation, offered by Teflon pieces (15 patients), or using a fibrin glue-coated Teflon sling (9 patients). Simple insertion of Teflon pieces and removal of a small vein were also performed in five and one patient, respectively. During the 2 years following MVD, 29 of 30 (96.7%) patients were asymptomatic or experienced only occasional pain that did not require medication. Temporary hemodynamic instability occurred in two patients during MVD, and seven patients experienced transient postoperative complications. Neither persistent morbidity nor mortality was reported.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that MVD without rhizotomy is a safe and effective treatment option for GPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.