Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29142508›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2017

Proteomic characterisation of bovine and avian purified protein derivatives and identification of specific antigens for serodiagnosis of bovine tuberculosis.

José Antonio Infantes-Lorenzo, Inmaculada Moreno, María de Los Ángeles Risalde, Álvaro Roy, Margarita Villar, Beatriz Romero, Nieves Ibarrola, José de la Fuente, Eugenia Puentes, Lucía de Juan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of serological assays forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic comparison betweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

José Antonio Infantes-Lorenzo *Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Unidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Majadahonda, Madrid Spain.
Inmaculada Moreno *Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Unidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Majadahonda, Madrid Spain.
María de Los Ángeles RisaldeSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Álvaro RoyVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita VillarSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Beatriz RomeroVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nieves IbarrolaUnidad de Proteómica, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer-USAL-CSIC, ProteoRed ISCIII, Campus Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.
José de la FuenteSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Eugenia PuentesCZ Veterinaria S.A, Porriño, Pontevedra Spain.
Lucía de JuanVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Christian GortázarSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Javier BezosVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes DomínguezCentro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Unidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Majadahonda, Madrid Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESCentro Nacional de Microbiologia · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESVodafone (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine purified protein derivative (bPPD) and avian purified protein derivative (aPPD) are widely used for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis. However, little is known about their qualitative and quantitative characteristics, which makes their standardisation difficult. In addition, bPPD can give false-positive tuberculosis results because of sequence homology between

methodsTrypsin digests of bPPD, aPPD and P22 were analysed by nanoscale liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Mice were immunised with bPPD or aPPD, and their serum was tested by indirect ELISA for reactivity against these preparations as well as against P22.

resultsA total of 456 proteins were identified in bPPD, 1019 in aPPD and 118 in P22; 146 of these proteins were shared by bPPD and aPPD, and 43 were present in all three preparations. Candidate proteins that may cause cross-reactivity between bPPD and aPPD were identified based on protein abundance and antigenic propensity. Serum reactivity experiments indicated that P22 may provide greater specificity than bPPD with similar sensitivity for ELISA-type detection of antibodies against

conclusionThe subpreparation from bPPD called P22 may be an alternative to bPPD for serodiagnosis of bovine tuberculosis, since it shares fewer proteins with aPPD than bPPD does, reducing risk of cross-reactivity with anti-

Indexed as

Cross-reactionP22PPDProteomeTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29142508
PMCPMC5669029
OpenAlexW2765577003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.