ArticlePharmacognosy magazine2017
Article in Pharmacognosy magazine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Pharmacological Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- In vitro study on efficacy of SKF7BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Antioxidant, Wound Healing Potential and In Silico Assessment of Naringin, Eicosane and Octacosane.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity of a new isocoumarin obtained from Marantodes pumilum var. pumila leaves.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- Anti-hyperuricemic and Anti-inflammatory Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectiveTo evaluate the inhibitory effects of three MATERIALS AND
methodsThe leaves and roots of
resultsDCM extract of MPL roots showed the highest inhibition of LPS-stimulated cytokine secretion with IC
conclusionThe results suggested that DCM extracts of MPL and MPP roots are potential anti-inflammatory agents by inhibiting the secretion of LPS- and MSU-stimulated pro-inflammatory cytokines and PGE SUMMARY: Amongst 18 tested extracts, DCM extracts of MPL and MPP roots remarkably inhibited LPS- and MSU-stimulated pro-inflammatory cytokines and PGE
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.