ArticleEvolutionary biology2017
Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some Overarching Issues, and General Conclusions.
Article in Evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Complex Interplay between Evolutionary Flexibility and Diversification in a Family of Spiders.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Size Disparity in Putative Primate Adaptive Radiations and Other Mammalian Clades.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Diverging selection on body size in specialist terrestrial mammals.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Extinction drives both expansion and contraction of morphological disparity in trilobites.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Conserved wing shape variation across biological scales unveils dialectical relationships between micro- and macroevolution.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The diffused evolutionary dynamics of morphological novelty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- What are patterns of rise and decline?Royal Society open science · 2023Review
- Reduced strength and increased variability of extinction selectivity during mass extinctions.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Diversity, distribution and intrinsic extinction vulnerability of exploited marine bivalves.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Cambrian origin but no early burst in functional disparity for Class Bivalvia.Biology letters · 2023Article
- Forty years later: The status of the "Big Five" mass extinctions.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2023Review
- Is species richness mediated by functional and genetic divergence? A global analysis in birds.Functional ecology · 2023Article
- Extinction and morphospace occupation: A critical review.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2023Review
- Article
- Topographically distinct adaptive landscapes for teeth, skeletons, and size explain the adaptive radiation of Carnivora (Mammalia).Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Analyzing Disparity and Rates of Morphological Evolution with Model-Based Phylogenetic Comparative Methods.Systematic biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolutionary legacies in contemporary tetrapod imperilment.Ecology letters · 2021Article
- Selectivity and the effect of mass extinctions on disparity and functional ecology.Science advances · 2021Article
- Deep drilling reveals massive shifts in evolutionary dynamics after formation of ancient ecosystem.Science advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approaches to macroevolution require integration of its two fundamental components, within a hierarchical framework. Following a companion paper on the origin of variation, I here discuss sorting within an evolutionary hierarchy. Species sorting-sometimes termed species selection in the broad sense, meaning differential origination and extinction owing to intrinsic biological properties-can be split into strict-sense species selection, in which rate differentials are governed by emergent, species-level traits such as geographic range size, and effect macroevolution, in which rates are governed by organism-level traits such as body size; both processes can create hitchhiking effects, indirectly causing the proliferation or decline of other traits. Several methods can operationalize the concept of emergence, so that rigorous separation of these processes is increasingly feasible. A macroevolutionary tradeoff, underlain by the intrinsic traits that influence evolutionary dynamics, causes speciation and extinction rates to covary in many clades, resulting in evolutionary volatility of some clades and more subdued behavior of others; the few clades that break the tradeoff can achieve especially prolific diversification. In addition to intrinsic biological traits at multiple levels, extrinsic events can drive the waxing and waning of clades, and the interaction of traits and events are difficult but important to disentangle. Evolutionary trends can arise in many ways, and at any hierarchical level; descriptive models can be fitted to clade trajectories in phenotypic or functional spaces, but they may not be diagnostic regarding processes, and close attention must be paid to both leading and trailing edges of apparent trends. Biotic interactions can have negative or positive effects on taxonomic diversity within a clade, but cannot be readily extrapolated from the nature of such interactions at the organismic level. The relationships among macroevolutionary currencies through time (taxonomic richness, morphologic disparity, functional variety) are crucial for understanding the nature of evolutionary diversification. A novel approach to diversity-disparity analysis shows that taxonomic diversifications can lag behind, occur in concert with, or precede, increases in disparity. Some overarching issues relating to both the origin and sorting of clades and phenotypes include the macroevolutionary role of mass extinctions, the potential differences between plant and animal macroevolution, whether macroevolutionary processes have changed through geologic time, and the growing human impact on present-day macroevolution. Many challenges remain, but progress is being made on two of the key ones: (a) the integration of variation-generating mechanisms and the multilevel sorting processes that act on that variation, and (b) the integration of paleontological and neontological approaches to historical biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.