ArticleScientific reports2017
Circulating miR-210 and miR-22 combined with ALT predict the virological response to interferon-alpha therapy of CHB patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unifying and unique roles of non-coding RNA biomarkers in liver and heart fibrosis.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Review
- Efficacy and predictors of pegylated-interferon in hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in immune active and inactive chronic hepatitis B patients.Journal of virus eradication · 2025Article
- The impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease on the efficacy of pegylated interferon-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Advances in the study of the mechanism of action of miR‑22 in liver lesions (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
- The Connection between MiR-122 and Lymphocytes in Patients Receiving Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Adverse Effect of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on the Therapeutic Response in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Article
- Liver Damage and microRNAs: An Update.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Significance of T-Cell Subsets for Clinical Response to Peginterferon Alfa-2a Therapy in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Role of circRNAs in viral infection and their significance for diagnosis and treatment (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2021Review
- Interferon and Hepatitis B: Current and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Circulating microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for hepatitis B virus liver fibrosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Placental microRNAs: Responders to environmental chemicals and mediators of pathophysiology of the human placenta.Toxicology reports · 2020Review
- Expression and significance of urinary microRNA in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Medicine · 2019Article
- MicroRNA Profile of HCV Spontaneous Clarified Individuals, Denotes Previous HCV Infection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) therapy of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is constrained by limited response and side effects. We described a panel of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) which could potentially predict outcome of IFN-α therapy. Here, we report development of a simplified scoring model for personalized treatment of CHB patients. 112 CHB patients receiving IFN-α treatment were randomly divided into a training (n = 75) or a validation group (n = 37). The expression of 15 candidate miRNAs was detected in training group with 5 miRNAs exhibiting significantly different levels (p < 0.0001) between early virological response (EVR) and non-early virological response (N-EVR). These 5 miRNAs were further tested in validation phase. Refinement analyses of results from training phase established a model composed of miR-210, miR-22 and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), with area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.874 and 0.816 in training and validation groups, respectively. In addition, this model showed prognostic value for sustained virological response (SVR) (AUC = 0.821). Collectively, this simplified scoring model composed of miR-210, miR-22 and ALT can reproducibly predict the EVR and SVR of IFN-α therapy in CHB patients. The model should help to forecast the outcome of IFN-α treatment prior to therapy decision involving nucleoside analogs or IFNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.