Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29142122›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2018

Adaptive Immune Responses following Senecavirus A Infection in Pigs.

Mayara F Maggioli, Steve Lawson, Marcelo de Lima, Lok R Joshi, Tatiane C Faccin, Fernando V Bauermann, Diego G Diel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phylogenetic Characterization and Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Seneca Valley virus 3CFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mayara F MaggioliAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Steve LawsonAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Marcelo de LimaAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Lok R JoshiAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Tatiane C FaccinAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Fernando V BauermannAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Diego G DielAnimal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ADRDL), Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA diego.diel@sdstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-8940
South Dakota State University · USUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senecavirus A (SVA), an emerging picornavirus of swine, causes vesicular disease (VD) that is clinically indistinguishable from foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in pigs. Many aspects of SVA interactions with the host and the host immune responses to infection, however, remain unknown. In the present study, humoral and cellular immune responses to SVA were evaluated following infection in pigs. We show that SVA infection elicited an early and robust virus-neutralizing (VN) antibody response, which coincided and was strongly correlated with VP2- and VP3-specific IgM responses. Notably, the neutralizing antibody (NA) responses paralleled the reduction of viremia and resolution of the disease. Analysis of the major porcine T-cell subsets revealed that during the acute/clinical phase of SVA infection (14 days postinfection [p.i.]), T-cell responses were characterized by an increased frequency of αβ T cells, especially CD4

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityPicornaviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralSwineSwine Vesicular DiseaseT-LymphocytesViremiaAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralSeneca Valley virusSVASVVvesicular diseasevirus-host interactions

Identifiers

PMID29142122
PMCPMC5774895
OpenAlexW2769396216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.