ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017
Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental evolution reveals differential evolutionary trajectories in male and female activity levels in response to sexual selection and metapopulation structure.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- No evidence that relatedness or familiarity modulates male harm inEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Metapopulation structure modulates sexual antagonism.Evolution letters · 2021Article
- Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- Male responses to sperm competition when rivals vary in number and familiarity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
- Inbreeding strategies under social and sexual complexity: insights from female and male guppies.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual conflict occurs when reproductive partners have different fitness optima, and can lead to the evolution of traits in one sex that inflict fitness costs on the opposite sex. Recently, it has been proposed that antagonism by males towards females should be reduced when they compete with relatives, because reducing the future productivity of a female would result in an indirect fitness cost for a harmful male. We tested this prediction in the seed beetle
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.