Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29142108›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2017

Growth and size control during development.

Jannik Vollmer, Fernando Casares, Dagmar Iber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jannik VollmerD-BSSE, ETH Zürich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Fernando CasaresCABD, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-JA, 41013 Seville, Spain fcasfer@upo.es.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-3858
Dagmar IberD-BSSE, ETH Zürich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland dagmar.iber@bsse.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8051-1035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size and shape of organs are characteristic for each species. Even when organisms develop to different sizes due to varying environmental conditions, such as nutrition, organ size follows species-specific rules of proportionality to the rest of the body, a phenomenon referred to as allometry. Therefore, for a given environment, organs stop growth at a predictable size set by the species's genotype. How do organs stop growth? How can related species give rise to organs of strikingly different size? No definitive answer has been given to date. One of the major models for the studies of growth termination is the vinegar fly

Indexed as

GrowthModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisAnimalsCell DifferentiationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophilagrowth controlgrowth terminationmathematical models

Identifiers

PMID29142108
PMCPMC5717347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.