Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29142078›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2018

Candida auris: a Review of the Literature.

Anna Jeffery-Smith, Surabhi K Taori, Silke Schelenz, Katie Jeffery, Elizabeth M Johnson, Andrew Borman, Candida auris Incident Management Team, Rohini Manuel, Colin S Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 338 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Medeniyet medical journal · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical Outcomes ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diabetes and Immunosuppression Drive Distinct Patterns ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. RefractoryASM case reports · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna Jeffery-SmithPublic Health England, United Kingdom anna.jefferysmith@phe.gov.uk colin.brown@phe.gov.uk.
Surabhi K TaoriKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Silke SchelenzRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Katie JefferyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth M JohnsonPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Andrew BormanPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Candida auris Incident Management Team
Rohini ManuelPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Colin S BrownPublic Health England, United Kingdom anna.jefferysmith@phe.gov.uk colin.brown@phe.gov.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging pathogen

Indexed as

CandidaCandidiasisCross InfectionDrug Resistance, FungalHumansCandida aurisemerging infectionnosocomial transmission

Identifiers

PMID29142078
PMCPMC5740969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.