Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141959›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

An integrative strategy to identify the entire protein coding potential of prokaryotic genomes by proteogenomics.

Ulrich Omasits, Adithi R Varadarajan, Michael Schmid, Sandra Goetze, Damianos Melidis, Marc Bourqui, Olga Nikolayeva, Maxime Québatte, Andrea Patrignani, Christoph Dehio and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. StORF-Reporter: finding genes between genes.Nucleic acids research · 2023
    Article
  11. Small proteins in Gram-positive bacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023
    Article
  12. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Prokaryotic Genome Annotation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrich OmasitsAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Adithi R VaradarajanAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Michael SchmidAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Sandra GoetzeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Damianos MelidisAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Marc BourquiAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Olga NikolayevaInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Maxime QuébatteBiozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea PatrignaniFunctional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH & UZH Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph DehioBiozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Juerg E FreyAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Mark D RobinsonInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Bernd WollscheidDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian H AhrensAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8148-7257
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Basel · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate annotation of all protein-coding sequences (CDSs) is an essential prerequisite to fully exploit the rapidly growing repertoire of completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes. However, large discrepancies among the number of CDSs annotated by different resources, missed functional short open reading frames (sORFs), and overprediction of spurious ORFs represent serious limitations. Our strategy toward accurate and complete genome annotation consolidates CDSs from multiple reference annotation resources, ab initio gene prediction algorithms and in silico ORFs (a modified six-frame translation considering alternative start codons) in an integrated proteogenomics database (iPtgxDB) that covers the entire protein-coding potential of a prokaryotic genome. By extending the PeptideClassifier concept of unambiguous peptides for prokaryotes, close to 95% of the identifiable peptides imply one distinct protein, largely simplifying downstream analysis. Searching a comprehensive

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialProteogenomicsBacterial ProteinsBartonella henselaeBradyrhizobiumDatabases, ProteinEscherichia coliMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesSoftwareBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29141959
PMCPMC5741054
OpenAlexW2953131540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.