ArticleBMC health services research2017
Patient influence in home-based reablement for older persons: qualitative research.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Experiences of delivering reablement to home-dwelling older persons: an interview study of community-based nursing assistants.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Conceptualizing the Facilitators and Barriers of Successful Multidisciplinary Teamwork Within the Reablement Process: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Emplacing reablement co-creating an outdoor recreation model in the rural Arctic.International journal of circumpolar health · 2023Article
- Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Reablement - relevant factors for implementation: an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study design.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Promotion of physical activity in older adults: facilitators and barriers experienced by healthcare personnel in the context of reablement.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Reablement professionals' perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Reablement through time and space: a scoping review of how the concept of 'reablement' for older people has been defined and operationalised.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Patient Involvement During a Pathway of Home-Based Reablement for Older Persons: A Longitudinal Single-Case Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Reablement Home Care: Effects on Care Attendants, Care Recipients, and Family Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Integration of Physical Activity in Reablement for Community Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Control as a Core Component of User Involvement in Reablement: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Enabling and constraining successful reablement: Individual and neighbourhood factors.PloS one · 2020Article
- A multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway: a clinical controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- Patient experiences with videoconferencing as social contact and in follow-up from oncology nurses in primary health care.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReablement services are rehabilitation for older people living at home, being person-centered in information, mapping and the goal-setting conversation. The purpose of this study was to gain knowledge about conversation processes and patient influence in formulating the patients' goals. There are two research questions: How do conversation theme, structure and processes appear in interactions aiming to decide goals of home-based reablement rehabilitation for the elderly? How professionals' communication skills do influence on patients' participation in conversation about everyday life and goals of home-based reablement?
methodsA qualitative field study explored eight cases of naturally occurring conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in a rehabilitation team. Patients were aged 67-90 years old. The reablement team consisted of an occupational therapist, physiotherapist, nurse and care workers. Data was collected by audio recording the conversations. Transcribed text was analyzed for conversational theme and communication patterns as they emerged within main themes.
resultsPatient participation differed with various professional leadership and communication in the information, mapping and goalsetting process. In the data material in its entirety, conversations consisted mainly of three parts where each part dealt with one of the three main topics. The first part was "Introduction to the program." The main part of the talk was about mapping ("Varying patient participation when discussing everyday life"), while the last part was about goal setting ("Goals of rehabilitation").
conclusionsHome-based reablement requires communication skills to encourage user participation, and mapping of resources and needs, leading to the formulation of objectives. Professional health workers must master integrating two intentions: goal-oriented and person-centered communication that requires communication skills and leadership ability in communication, promoting patient influence and goal-setting. Quality of such conversations is complex, and requires the ability to apply integrated knowledge, skills and attitudes appropriate to communication situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.