Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141666›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Intron retention enhances gene regulatory complexity in vertebrates.

Ulf Schmitz, Natalia Pinello, Fangzhi Jia, Sultan Alasmari, William Ritchie, Maria-Cristina Keightley, Shaniko Shini, Graham J Lieschke, Justin J-L Wong, John E J Rasko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Intron Retention Controls Localization of lncRNAsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulf SchmitzGene & Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-4662
Natalia PinelloGene & Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia.
Fangzhi JiaGene & Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia.
Sultan AlasmariAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC, Australia.
William RitchieCNRS, UMR 5203, Montpellier, 34094, France.
Maria-Cristina KeightleyAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC, Australia.
Shaniko ShiniSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Graham J LieschkeAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC, Australia.
Justin J-L WongGene & Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia.
John E J RaskoGene & Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia. j.rasko@centenary.org.au.
The University of Sydney · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1126306National Health and Medical Research Council (AU) 1061906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile intron retention (IR) is now widely accepted as an important mechanism of mammalian gene expression control, it remains the least studied form of alternative splicing. To delineate conserved features of IR, we performed an exhaustive phylogenetic analysis in a highly purified and functionally defined cell type comprising neutrophilic granulocytes from five vertebrate species spanning 430 million years of evolution.

resultsOur RNA-sequencing-based analysis suggests that IR increases gene regulatory complexity, which is indicated by a strong anti-correlation between the number of genes affected by IR and the number of protein-coding genes in the genome of individual species. Our results confirm that IR affects many orthologous or functionally related genes in granulocytes. Further analysis uncovers new and unanticipated conserved characteristics of intron-retaining transcripts. We find that intron-retaining genes are transcriptionally co-regulated from bidirectional promoters. Intron-retaining genes have significantly longer 3' UTR sequences, with a corresponding increase in microRNA binding sites, some of which include highly conserved sequence motifs. This suggests that intron-retaining genes are highly regulated post-transcriptionally.

conclusionsOur study provides unique insights concerning the role of IR as a robust and evolutionarily conserved mechanism of gene expression regulation. Our findings enhance our understanding of gene regulatory complexity by adding another contributor to evolutionary adaptation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsBinding SitesConserved SequenceGenomeHumansIntronsMaleMicroRNAsPromoter Regions, GeneticSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsVertebratesMicroRNAsAlternative splicingEvolutionGene regulationGranulocytesIntron retentionTranscriptomic complexity

Identifiers

PMID29141666
PMCPMC5688624
OpenAlexW2769405608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.