Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141661›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Preventing enduring behavioural problems in young children through early psychological intervention (Healthy Start, Happy Start): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Paul G Ramchandani, Christine O'Farrelly, Daphne Babalis, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Sarah Byford, Ellen S R Grimas, Jane E Iles, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Julia McGinley, Charlotte M Phillips and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Paul G RamchandaniCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. p.ramchandani@imperial.ac.uk.
Christine O'FarrellyCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Daphne BabalisImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, 59-61 North Wharf Road, London, W2 1LA, UK.
Marian J Bakermans-KranenburgCentre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sarah ByfordKing's Health Economics, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, PO24 David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Ellen S R GrimasCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Jane E IlesCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Marinus H van IJzendoornCentre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Julia McGinleyNetmums, Henry Wood House, 2 Riding House Street, London, W1W 7FA, UK.
Charlotte M PhillipsCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Alan SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Jane WarwickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Hillary C WattSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Reynolds Building, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Stephen ScottDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/04/33Health Technology Assessment Programme 13/04/33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBehavioural problems are common in early childhood, and can result in enduring costs to the individual and society, including an increased risk of mental and physical illness, criminality, educational failure and drug and alcohol misuse. Most previous research has examined the impact of interventions targeting older children when difficulties are more established and harder to change, and have rarely included fathers. We are conducting a trial of a psychological intervention delivered to families with very young children, engaging both parents where possible.

methodsThis study is a two-arm, parallel group, researcher-blind, randomized controlled trial, to test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a parenting intervention, Video Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) for parents of young children (12-36 months) at risk of behavioural difficulties. VIPP-SD is an evidence-based parenting intervention developed at Leiden University in the Netherlands which uses a video-feedback approach to support parents, particularly by enhancing parental sensitivity and sensitive discipline in caring for children. The trial will involve 300 families, who will be randomly allocated into either an intervention group, who will receive the video-feedback intervention (n = 150), or a control group, who will receive treatment as usual (n = 150). The trial will evaluate whether VIPP-SD, compared to treatment as usual, leads to lower levels of behavioural problems in young children who are at high risk of developing these difficulties. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and 5 and 24 months post-randomization. The primary outcome measure is a modified version of the Preschool Parental Account of Child Symptoms (Pre-PACS), a structured clinical interview of behavioural symptoms. Secondary outcomes include caregiver-reported behavioural difficulties, parenting behaviours, parental sensitivity, parental mood and anxiety and parental relationship adjustment. An economic evaluation will also be carried out to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to treatment as usual. DISCUSSION: If shown to be effective, the intervention could be delivered widely to parents and caregivers of young children at risk of behavioural problems as part of community based services.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN58327365 . Registered 19 March 2015.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorParent-Child RelationsParentingVideo RecordingAge FactorsChild Behavior DisordersChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Medical InterventionFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInfantInfant BehaviorAttachmentBehavioural problemsEarly interventionRandomized controlled trialSensitive parentingVideo feedback

Identifiers

PMID29141661
PMCPMC5688689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.