ArticleGenome biology2017
Early career researchers want Open Science.
Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating open science education into an undergraduate health professional research program.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Close to open-Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education.PloS one · 2022Article
- Next-generation field courses: Integrating Open Science and online learning.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand on Open Science Practices? A Survey Within the Max Planck Society.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2020Article
- Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study.HRB open research · 2020Article
- Article
- The bio.tools registry of software tools and data resources for the life sciences.Genome biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open Science is encouraged by the European Union and many other political and scientific institutions. However, scientific practice is proving slow to change. We propose, as early career researchers, that it is our task to change scientific research into open scientific research and commit to Open Science principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.