Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141637›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2017

Molecules produced by probiotics prevent enteric colibacillosis in pigs.

Ricardo Nordeste, Akalate Tessema, Sapana Sharma, Zlatko Kovač, Chuan Wang, Rocio Morales, Mansel William Griffiths

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of aThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of an In Vivo Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Evaluation of aTranslational animal science · 2023
    Article
  8. Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo NordesteMicroSintesis Inc., Duffy Research Centre, NRC Building 28, 550 University Ave, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Akalate TessemaCanadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Sapana SharmaCanadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Zlatko KovačDepartment of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, 1870, Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Chuan WangCanadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Rocio MoralesCanadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Mansel William GriffithsCanadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. mgriffit@uoguelph.ca.
University of Guelph · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC CRDPJ 452272-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advent of antimicrobial resistance in animal pathogens, novel methods to combat infectious diseases are being sought. Among these, probiotics have been proposed as a means of promoting animal health but problems with their use has been reported. Research has demonstrated that bioactive molecules produced during the growth of certain probiotics interfere with bacterial cell-to-cell communication, which consequently results in an attenuation of virulence in a number of pathogens, including E. coli. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of the bioactive molecules, termed proteobiotics, produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus in preventing enterotoxigenic E, coli (ETEC) infection in pigs, which is the etiological agent for enteric colibacillosis, a common disease of nursing and young pigs.

resultsTo achieve this, piglets were fed a preparation of the bioactive at four levels: 0, 0.5×, 1.0× and 2.0× for 7 days prior to challenge with E. coli K88. There were 36 pigs (18 gilts and 18 barrows) per treatment, resulting in 144 piglets in total for the study. Each pen had 6 piglets (3 gilts and 3 barrows). Only piglets with no physical abnormality or conditions were used in the trial and intact male piglets and ridglings were excluded. The bioactive continued to be fed to the pigs post-challenge. Based of fecal and demeanour scores, pigs fed the low and high dose of the proteobiotic were significanlty less likely to show symptoms of illness than pigs fed no bioactive. While not being significant, the weight gain of pigs given the proteobiotics was improved. At day 4 following challenge, almost 50% of piglets that did not receive the proteobiotic were shedding ETEC in their feces, compared with about 15% of animals receiving the supplement. There was also an indication that the proteobiotics reduced colonization of the ileum by E. coli K88 and improved gut health.

conclusionThis study indicates that the bioactive molecules produced by L. acidophilus reduces incidence of enteric colibacillosis in pigs and their use on farms would help to reduce antibiotic use.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliLactobacillus acidophilusAnimalsColonEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumMaleProbioticsSwineSwine DiseasesWeight GainAnti-virulenceBioactive moleculesE. coliEnteric colibacillosisPigsProbioticsProteobiotics

Identifiers

PMID29141637
PMCPMC5688758
OpenAlexW2769487158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.