Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141635›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a "safe approach" to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm.

Anna Nielsen, Ayesha De Costa, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Mariano Salazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. BMJ open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna NielsenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health K6, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.nielsen.1@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-6949
Ayesha De CostaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina Gemzell DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health K6, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mariano SalazarDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia trachomatis testing is offered to youth in Sweden, through a network of Youth Health Clinics, free at the point of care, in an attempt to bring down the prevalence and incidence of the infection. Nevertheless, infections rates have continued to rise during the past two decades and re-testing rates among youth for Chlamydia trachomatis has been reported to be high in Stockholm County. A few literature reports suggest that testing for sexually transmitted infections and the test result itself can have an undesirable impact on the sexual behaviour for the individual, i.e. increase sexual risk-taking.

methodsThis qualitative study aimed to explore the motives for repeated testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among youth using the services of the Youth Health Clinics in Stockholm, and how testing affects their subsequent risk-taking. We interviewed 15 repeat testers aging 18-22 years.

resultsOur main findings were that the fear of social stigma related to infecting a peer was a major driver of the re-testing process. The repetitive testing process, the test result, and the encounter with personnel did not decrease sexual risk-taking among this group.

conclusionsWhile testing and treatment services are an important part of Chlamydia trachomatis prevention it must not take the focus away from primary prevention strategies. Testing should be encouraged, but not to the exclusion of risk reduction measures. The testing services must be complemented with stronger emphasis on safe sex, especially for those who attend the clinics repeatedly, otherwise the easy accessible testing services risk counteracting its own purpose. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating youth appropriate interventions to increase condom use, taking into consideration factors which youth perceive as important to drive this behaviour change.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChlamydia InfectionsContact TracingCultureFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMotivationPeer GroupPrevalenceQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersSocial StigmaChlamydia trachomatisHealth care utilizationRepeat testingSexual behaviourSexual healthStigmaSwedenYouth

Identifiers

PMID29141635
PMCPMC5688721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.