Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141603›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2017

DETECT I & DETECT II: a study protocol for a prospective multicentre observational study to validate the UroMark assay for the detection of bladder cancer from urinary cells.

Wei Shen Tan, Andrew Feber, Liqin Dong, Rachael Sarpong, Sheida Rezaee, Simon Rodney, Pramit Khetrapal, Patricia de Winter, Frelyn Ocampo, Rumana Jalil and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676180 completednot on this map

A Prospective Observational Study to Determine the Negative Predictive Value of UroMark to Rule Out the Presence of Bladder Cancer in Patients With Haematuria.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2016 to 2017Enrolled3,700ConditionsBladder CancerArmsGroup
NCT02781428 completednot on this map

A Multicentre Observational Study Design to Determine the Sensitivity of the UroMark Assay, a Urine Test, to Detect New and Recurrent Low, Intermediate and High Grade Bladder Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,643ConditionsBladder Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Epidemiology, aetiology and screening of bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2019
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Shen TanDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. wei.tan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-4043
Andrew FeberUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Liqin DongUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Rachael SarpongSurgical & Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sheida RezaeeUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Simon RodneyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
Pramit KhetrapalDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
Patricia de WinterDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
Frelyn OcampoDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Rumana JalilSurgical & Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Norman R WilliamsSurgical & Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Chris Brew-GravesSurgical & Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
John D KellyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
University College London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council Kelly MR/M025411/1Medical Research Council MR/M025411/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaematuria is a common finding in general practice which requires visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy as well as upper tract imaging. In addition, patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often require surveillance cystoscopy as often as three monthly depending on disease risk. However, cystoscopy is an invasive procedure which is uncomfortable, requires hospital attendance and is associated with a risk of urinary tract infection. We have developed the UroMark assay, which can detect 150 methylation specific alteration specific to bladder cancer using DNA from urinary sediment cells.

methodsDETECT I and DETECT II are two multi-centre prospective observational studies designed to conduct a robust validation of the UroMark assay. DETECT I will recruit patients having diagnostic investigations for haematuria to determine the negative predictive value of the UroMark to rule out the presence of bladder cancer. DETECT II will recruit patients with new or recurrent bladder cancer to determine the sensitivity of the UroMark in detecting low, intermediate and high grade bladder cancer. NMIBC patients in DETECT II will be followed up with three monthly urine sample collection for 24 months while having surveillance cystoscopy. DETECT II will include a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews to explore patients' experience of being diagnosed with bladder cancer and having cystoscopy and a urinary test for bladder cancer surveillance. Results of the UroMark will be compared to cystoscopy findings and histopathological results in patients with bladder cancer. DISCUSSION: A sensitive and specific urinary biomarker will revolutionise the haematuria diagnostic pathway and surveillance strategies for NMIBC patients. None of the six approved US Food and Drug Administration urinary test are recommended as a standalone test. The UroMark assay is based on next generation sequencing technology which interrogates 150 loci and represents a step change compared to other biomarker panels. This enhances the sensitivity of the test and by using a random forest classifier approach, where the UroMark results are derived from a cut off generated from known outcomes of previous samples, addresses many shortcomings of previous assays.

trial registrationBoth trails are registered on clinicaltrials.gov. DETECT I: NCT02676180 (18th December 2015). DETECT II: NCT02781428 (11th May 2016).

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleProspective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancerClinical trialDiagnosticHaematuriaMethylationNext generation sequencingSurveillanceUrinary assayUrinary biomarkerValidation

Identifiers

PMID29141603
PMCPMC5688623
OpenAlexW2768736156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.