Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141589›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Reconstructing cancer karyotypes from short read data: the half empty and half full glass.

Rami Eitan, Ron Shamir

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rami EitanBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Ron ShamirBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel. rami.eitan@gmail.com.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (IL) 317/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring cancer progression genomes undergo point mutations as well as larger segmental changes. The latter include, among others, segmental deletions duplications, translocations and inversions.The result is a highly complex, patient-specific cancer karyotype. Using high-throughput technologies of deep sequencing and microarrays it is possible to interrogate a cancer genome and produce chromosomal copy number profiles and a list of breakpoints ("jumps") relative to the normal genome. This information is very detailed but local, and does not give the overall picture of the cancer genome. One of the basic challenges in cancer genome research is to use such information to infer the cancer karyotype. We present here an algorithmic approach, based on graph theory and integer linear programming, that receives segmental copy number and breakpoint data as input and produces a cancer karyotype that is most concordant with them. We used simulations to evaluate the utility of our approach, and applied it to real data.

resultsBy using a simulation model, we were able to estimate the correctness and robustness of the algorithm in a spectrum of scenarios. Under our base scenario, designed according to observations in real data, the algorithm correctly inferred 69% of the karyotypes. However, when using less stringent correctness metrics that account for incomplete and noisy data, 87% of the reconstructed karyotypes were correct. Furthermore, in scenarios where the data were very clean and complete, accuracy rose to 90%-100%. Some examples of analysis of real data, and the reconstructed karyotypes suggested by our algorithm, are also presented.

conclusionWhile reconstruction of complete, perfect karyotype based on short read data is very hard, a large fraction of the reconstruction will still be correct and can provide useful information.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosome AberrationsChromosome BreakpointsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaryotypeKaryotypingNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNACancerDeep sequencingGenome rearrangementsGraph theoryInteger linear programmingKaryotypesReconstructionStructural and numerical variations

Identifiers

PMID29141589
PMCPMC5688766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.