Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141580›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Usability of human Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip for mouse DNA methylation studies.

Maria Needhamsen, Ewoud Ewing, Harald Lund, David Gomez-Cabrero, Robert Adam Harris, Lara Kular, Maja Jagodic

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Age-associated epigenetic change in chimpanzees and humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Colorectal cancer-associated microbiota contributes to oncogenic epigenetic signatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria NeedhamsenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-5597
Ewoud EwingDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Harald LundApplied Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital at Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
David Gomez-CabreroUnit of Computational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Solna, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robert Adam HarrisApplied Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital at Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lara KularDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maja JagodicDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. maja.jagodic@ki.se.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKing's College London · GB

Funding

The Swedish Foundation for MS Research NAThe Swedish Research Council K2015-61X-20776-08-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of array-based genome-wide DNA methylation methods has enabled quantitative measurement of single CpG methylation status at relatively low cost and sample input. Whereas the use of Infinium Human Methylation BeadChips has shown great utility in clinical studies, no equivalent tool is available for rodent animal samples. We examined the feasibility of using the new Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip for studying DNA methylation in mouse.

resultsIn silico, we identified 19,420 EPIC probes (referred as mEPIC probes), which align with a unique best alignment score to the bisulfite converted reference mouse genome mm10. Further annotation revealed that 85% of mEPIC probes overlapped with mm10.refSeq genes at different genomic features including promoters (TSS1500 and TSS200), 1st exons, 5'UTRs, 3'UTRs, CpG islands, shores, shelves, open seas and FANTOM5 enhancers. Hybridization of mouse samples to Infinium Human MethylationEPIC BeadChips showed successful measurement of mEPIC probes and reproducibility between inter-array biological replicates. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of mEPIC probes for data exploration such as hierarchical clustering.

conclusionsGiven the absence of cost and labor convenient genome-wide technologies in the murine system, our findings show that the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip platform is suitable for investigation of the mouse methylome. Furthermore, we provide the "mEPICmanifest" with genomic features, available to users of Infinium Human MethylationEPIC arrays for mouse samples.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsCpG IslandsGenomicsHumansMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsCatChimpanzeeCownDNA methylationDogEpicEpigeneticsGuinea pigInfinium BeadChipMacaqueMousePigRabbitRatSheep

Identifiers

PMID29141580
PMCPMC5688710
OpenAlexW2769117443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.