Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141551›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2019

Noninvasive Cerebellar Stimulation as a Complement Tool to Pharmacotherapy.

Roberta Ferrucci, Tommaso Bocci, Francesca Cortese, Fabiana Ruggiero, Alberto Priori

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Time Is Cerebellum.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta FerrucciAldo Ravelli" Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso BocciCa' Granda IRCCS Foundation Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesca CorteseCa' Granda IRCCS Foundation Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Fabiana RuggieroCa' Granda IRCCS Foundation Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alberto PrioriAldo Ravelli" Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebellar ataxias represent a wide and heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by balance and coordination disturbance, dysarthria, dyssynergia and adyadococinesia, caused by a dysfunction in the cerebellum. In recent years there has been growing interest in discovering therapeutical strategy for specific forms of cerebellar ataxia. Together with pharmacological studies, there has been growing interest in non-invasive cerebellar stimulation techniques to improve ataxia and limb coordination. Both transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive techniques to modulate cerebro and cerebellar cortex excitability using magnetic or electric fields.

methodsHere we aim to review the most relevant studies regarding the application of TMS and tDCS for the treatment of cerebellar ataxia.

conclusionAs pharmacological strategies were shown to be effective in specific forms of cerebellar ataxia and are not devoid of collateral effects, non-invasive stimulation may represent a promising strategy to improve residual cerebellar circuits functioning and a complement tool to pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellar AtaxiaCerebellumCombined Modality TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationataxiacerebellar tDCScerebellar TMScerebellumnon invasive neuromodulationtDCS.

Identifiers

PMID29141551
PMCPMC6341494
OpenAlexW2769979735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.