Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141515›Full record

ReviewMinimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy2018

MRI-powered biomedical devices.

Sierra Hovet, Hongliang Ren, Sheng Xu, Bradford Wood, Junichi Tokuda, Zion Tsz Ho Tse

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Magnetically steerable catheters: State of the art review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sierra Hoveta College of Engineering , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Hongliang Renb Department of Biomedical Engineering , National University of Singapore , Singapore.
Sheng Xuc Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences , NIH Clinical Center, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , Bethesda , MD , USA.
Bradford Woodc Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences , NIH Clinical Center, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , Bethesda , MD , USA.
Junichi Tokudae Department of Radiology , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.
Zion Tsz Ho Tsea College of Engineering , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Center for Cancer Research · USUniversity of Georgia · USHarvard University · USNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Navigation Tools for Image Guided Minimally invasive TherapiesZIACL040011 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is beneficial for imaging-guided procedures because it provides higher resolution images and better soft tissue contrast than computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and X-ray. MRI can be used to streamline diagnostics and treatment because it does not require patients to be repositioned between scans of different areas of the body. It is even possible to use MRI to visualize, power, and control medical devices inside the human body to access remote locations and perform minimally invasive procedures. Therefore, MR conditional medical devices have the potential to improve a wide variety of medical procedures; this potential is explored in terms of practical considerations pertaining to clinical applications and the MRI environment. Recent advancements in this field are introduced with a review of clinically relevant research in the areas of interventional tools, endovascular microbots, and closed-loop controlled MRI robots. Challenges related to technology and clinical feasibility are discussed, including MRI based propulsion and control, navigation of medical devices through the human body, clinical adoptability, and regulatory issues. The development of MRI-powered medical devices is an emerging field, but the potential clinical impact of these devices is promising.

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleCatheterizationDrug Delivery SystemsElectromagnetic FieldsEquipment DesignHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRoboticsmechatronicsmicrobotsMRI conditionalMRI powered

Identifiers

PMID29141515
PMCPMC6504181
OpenAlexW2769292934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.