Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141086›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2018

Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in the Assessment of Surgical Resident Competency.

Justin P Wagner, Catherine E Lewis, Areti Tillou, Vatche G Agopian, Chi Quach, Timothy R Donahue, O Joe Hines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HANDS-ON: Training Simulation in Surgery.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin P WagnerDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Catherine E Lewis
Areti TillouDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Vatche G AgopianDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Chi QuachDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Timothy R DonahueDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
O Joe HinesDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Competency-based assessments of surgical resident performance require metrics of entrustable autonomy. Objectives: To designate entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in global performance and in specific operations, and to identify differences in perceived capability, autonomy, and expectations between surgical faculty and residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted from August 9, 2016, through August 24, 2016, in the Department of Surgery at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine. The survey instrument consisted of 5-point Likert scales for assessing perceptions of entrustability for 5 global and 5 operative EPAs. Faculty members were surveyed regarding resident capabilities and expected capabilities by postgraduate year. Residents were surveyed regarding their own capabilities, actual autonomy entrusted in the last EPA performed, and expected capabilities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in mean ratings were assessed across 7 comparison domains. Results: Among 78 total faculty members, 31 (40%) participated in the survey. Among 49 residents, 39 (80%) participated in the survey. Residents generally rated their global EPA performance higher than the faculty did (mean, 3.7 vs 2.8; P < .01), but operative EPA performance ratings were equivalent (mean, 2.7 vs 2.4; P < .12). Faculty members perceived senior residents as underperforming expectations in operative EPAs. Most faculty members (80%) expected residents not to be independently capable of performing complex operations by graduation. Faculty members perceived residents in postgraduate years 4 and 5 to have greater operative capability than the level of autonomy entrusted to those residents (95% CI, 3.3-3.5 vs 1.9-2.2). Conclusions and Relevance: Global and operative EPAs are practical for developing competency-based curricula. Graduated autonomy should be granted to improve the operative experience for residents.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFaculty, MedicalProfessional AutonomyGeneral SurgeryHumansInternship and ResidencyPerceptionSelf-AssessmentSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurveys and QuestionnairesTrust

Identifiers

PMID29141086
PMCPMC5933400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.