ArticlePloS one2017
Transcriptome profiling of claw muscle of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) at different fattening stages.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatopancreas immune response during molt cycle in the mud crab, Scylla paramamosain.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Single-molecule long-read sequencing of Scylla paramamosain.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In crustaceans, muscle growth and development is complicated, and to date substantial knowledge gaps exist. In this study, the claw muscle, hepatopancreas and nervous tissue of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) were collected at three fattening stages for sequence by the Illumina sequencing. A total of 127.87 Gb clean data with no less than 3.94 Gb generated for each sample and the cycleQ30 percentages were more than 86.13% for all samples. De Bruijn assembly of these clean data produced 94,853 unigenes, thereinto, 50,059 unigenes were found in claw muscle. A total of 121 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were revealed in claw muscle from the three fattening stages with a Padj value < 0.01, including 63 genes with annotation. Functional annotation and enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs clusters represented the predominant gene catalog with roles in biochemical processes (glycolysis, phosphorylation and regulation of transcription), molecular function (ATP binding, 6-phosphofructokinase activity, and sequence-specific DNA binding) and cellular component (6-phosphofructokinase complex, plasma membrane, and integral component of membrane). qRT-PCR was employed to further validate certain DEGs. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis obtained 159,322, 125,963 and 166,279 potential SNPs from the muscle transcriptome at stage B, stage C and stage D, respectively. In addition, there were sixteen neuropeptide transcripts being predicted in the claw muscle. The present study provides a comprehensive transcriptome of claw muscle of S. paramamosain during fattening, providing a basis for screening the functional genes that may affect muscle growth of S. paramamosain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.