Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29141012›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Effects of music therapy and music-based interventions in the treatment of substance use disorders: A systematic review.

Louisa Hohmann, Joke Bradt, Thomas Stegemann, Stefan Koelsch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05180617 (Feasibility of Music Therapy, Neural Processing and Reduction of Craving in Community Substance Misuse Treatment Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05180617 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of Music Therapy, Neural Processing and Reduction of Craving in Community Substance Misuse Treatment Services (CSMTS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnglia Ruskin UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsSubstance Use DisordersArmsMusic Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Music therapy for people with substance use disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Adolescent music engagement is associated with less alcohol consumption and substance experimentation 5-11 years later: A genetically informative study.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Louisa HohmannDepartment for Educational Sciences and Psychology, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Joke BradtDepartment of Creative Arts Therapies, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States of America.
Thomas StegemannDepartment of Music Therapy, University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan KoelschDepartment for Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Drexel University · USFreie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Music and Performing Arts Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music therapy (MT) and music-based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used for the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). Previous reviews on the efficacy of MT emphasized the dearth of research evidence for this topic, although various positive effects were identified. Therefore, we conducted a systematic search on published articles examining effects of music, MT and MBIs and found 34 quantitative and six qualitative studies. There was a clear increase in the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past few years. We had planned for a meta-analysis, but due to the diversity of the quantitative studies, effect sizes were not computed. Beneficial effects of MT/ MBI on emotional and motivational outcomes, participation, locus of control, and perceived helpfulness were reported, but results were inconsistent across studies. Furthermore, many RCTs focused on effects of single sessions. No published longitudinal trials could be found. The analysis of the qualitative studies revealed four themes: emotional expression, group interaction, development of skills, and improvement of quality of life. Considering these issues for quantitative research, there is a need to examine social and health variables in future studies. In conclusion, due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the efficacy of MT/ MBI in SUD treatment still remains unclear.

Indexed as

Music TherapyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacySubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29141012
PMCPMC5687713
OpenAlexW2770039214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.