Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29140767›Full record

ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2017

Genomic Medicine Without Borders: Which Strategies Should Developing Countries Employ to Invest in Precision Medicine? A New "Fast-Second Winner" Strategy.

Konstantinos Mitropoulos, David N Cooper, Christina Mitropoulou, Spiros Agathos, Jürgen K V Reichardt, Fatima Al-Maskari, Wasun Chantratita, Ambroise Wonkam, Collet Dandara, Theodora Katsila and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Konstantinos Mitropoulos1 School of Medicine, University of Athens , Athens, Greece .
David N Cooper2 Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Cardiff, United Kingdom .
Christina Mitropoulou3 The Golden Helix Foundation , London, United Kingdom .
Spiros Agathos4 Yachay Tech University , San Miguel de Urcuquí, Ecuador .
Jürgen K V Reichardt4 Yachay Tech University , San Miguel de Urcuquí, Ecuador .
Fatima Al-Maskari5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .
Wasun Chantratita7 Department of Pathology, Medical Genomic Center, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand .
Ambroise Wonkam8 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Medicine and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa .
Collet Dandara8 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Medicine and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa .
Theodora Katsila9 Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras , Patras, Greece .
Catalina Lopez-Correa10 Genome British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada .
Bassam R Ali5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .
George P Patrinos5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .

Funding

Sickle Africa Data Coordinating CenterU24HL135600 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MULDER, NICOLA, WONKAM, AMBROISE · 2017 to 2025
$8.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL135600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic medicine has greatly matured in terms of its technical capabilities, but the diffusion of genomic innovations worldwide faces significant barriers beyond mere access to technology. New global development strategies are sorely needed for biotechnologies such as genomics and their applications toward precision medicine without borders. Moreover, diffusion of genomic medicine globally cannot adhere to a "one-size-fits-all-countries" development strategy, in the same way that drug treatments should be customized. This begs a timely, difficult but crucial question: How should developing countries, and the resource-limited regions of developed countries, invest in genomic medicine? Although a full-scale investment in infrastructure from discovery to the translational implementation of genomic science is ideal, this may not always be feasible in all countries at all times. A simple "transplantation of genomics" from developed to developing countries is unlikely to be feasible. Nor should developing countries be seen as simple recipients and beneficiaries of genomic medicine developed elsewhere because important advances in genomic medicine have materialized in developing countries as well. There are several noteworthy examples of genomic medicine success stories involving resource-limited settings that are contextualized and described in this global genomic medicine innovation analysis. In addition, we outline here a new long-term development strategy for global genomic medicine in a way that recognizes the individual country's pressing public health priorities and disease burdens. We term this approach the "Fast-Second Winner" model of innovation that supports innovation commencing not only "upstream" of discovery science but also "mid-stream," building on emerging highly promising biomarker and diagnostic candidates from the global science discovery pipeline, based on the unique needs of each country. A mid-stream entry into innovation can enhance collective learning from other innovators' mistakes upstream in discovery science and boost the probability of success for translation and implementation when resources are limited. This à la carte model of global innovation and development strategy offers multiple entry points into the global genomics innovation ecosystem for developing countries, whether or not extensive and expensive discovery infrastructures are already in place. Ultimately, broadening our thinking beyond the linear model of innovation will help us to enable the vision and practice of genomics without borders in both developed and resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCost of IllnessDeveloping CountriesEcological Parameter MonitoringEthnicityGenomicsHealth PersonnelHumansLinear ModelsPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicinePublic Healthdeveloping countriesFast-Second Winnerprecision medicinepublic health genomicStrategy for global biotechnology development

Identifiers

PMID29140767
PMCPMC6436026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.