Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29140510›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Saccharomyces genome database informs human biology.

Marek S Skrzypek, Robert S Nash, Edith D Wong, Kevin A MacPherson, Sage T Hellerstedt, Stacia R Engel, Kalpana Karra, Shuai Weng, Travis K Sheppard, Gail Binkley and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ExploringMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. YPIBP: A repository for phosphoinositide-binding proteins in yeast.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Databases for Protein-Protein Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Building a pipeline to solicit expert knowledge from the community to aid gene summary curation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marek S SkrzypekDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Robert S NashDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Edith D WongDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Kevin A MacPhersonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Sage T HellerstedtDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Stacia R EngelDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Kalpana KarraDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Shuai WengDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Travis K SheppardDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Gail BinkleyDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Matt SimisonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Stuart R MiyasatoDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
J Michael CherryDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5120 USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Genomic Resource for the Yeast SaccharomycesU41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 2011 to 2020
$26.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG001315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD; http://www.yeastgenome.org) is an expertly curated database of literature-derived functional information for the model organism budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SGD constantly strives to synergize new types of experimental data and bioinformatics predictions with existing data, and to organize them into a comprehensive and up-to-date information resource. The primary mission of SGD is to facilitate research into the biology of yeast and to provide this wealth of information to advance, in many ways, research on other organisms, even those as evolutionarily distant as humans. To build such a bridge between biological kingdoms, SGD is curating data regarding yeast-human complementation, in which a human gene can successfully replace the function of a yeast gene, and/or vice versa. These data are manually curated from published literature, made available for download, and incorporated into a variety of analysis tools provided by SGD.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, FungalForecastingGene OntologyGenes, FungalGenome, HumanHumansMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID29140510
PMCPMC5753351
OpenAlexW2767641615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.