Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29140439›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2018

Bivalent Vaccine Effectiveness Against Type-Specific HPV Positivity: Evidence for Cross-Protection Against Oncogenic Types Among Dutch STI Clinic Visitors.

Petra J Woestenberg, Audrey J King, Birgit H B van Benthem, Robine Donken, Suzan Leussink, Fiona R M van der Klis, Hester E de Melker, Marianne A B van der Sande, Christian J P A Hoebe, Johannes A Bogaards and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Petra J WoestenbergCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Audrey J KingCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit H B van BenthemCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robine DonkenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzan LeussinkCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fiona R M van der KlisCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester E de MelkerCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marianne A B van der SandeCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian J P A HoebeCare and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes A BogaardsCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Medical Microbiological Laboratories and the Public Health Services
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Observational postmarketing studies are important to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE). We estimated VE from the bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine against HPV positivity of vaccine and nonvaccine types in a high-risk population. Methods: We included all vaccine-eligible women from the PASSYON study, a biennial cross-sectional survey in Dutch sexually transmitted infection clinics. Vaginal swabs were analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay (SPF10-LiPA25) able to detect the 12 high-risk HPV (hrHPV) types 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59. We compared hrHPV positivity between self-reported vaccinated (≥1 dose) and unvaccinated women, and estimated VE by a logistic mixed model. Results: We included 1087 women of which 53% were hrHPV positive and 60% reported to be vaccinated. The adjusted pooled VE against HPV-16/18 was 89.9% (81.7%-94.4%). Moreover, we calculated significant VE against nonvaccine types HPV-45 (91%), HPV-35 (57%), HPV-31 (50%), and HPV-52 (37%). Among women who were offered vaccination 5/6 years ago, we estimated similar VE against HPV-16/18 (92%) and all hrHPV types (35%) compared to women who were offered vaccination <5 years ago (83% and 33%, respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrated high VE of the bivalent vaccine against HPV-16/18 and cross-protection against HPV-45/35/31/52. Protection against HPV-16/18 was sustained up to 6 years postvaccination.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNetherlandsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTreatment OutcomeVaginaYoung Adulthuman papillomavirus vaccine, L1 type 16, 18Papillomavirus VaccinesCervarixhuman papillomavirushuman papillomavirus vaccinepublic healthvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID29140439
PMCPMC5853250
OpenAlexW2784272328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.