Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29140407›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2018

Targeted Treatment of Yaws With Household Contact Tracing: How Much Do We Miss?

Louise Dyson, Michael Marks, Oliver M Crook, Oliver Sokana, Anthony W Solomon, Alex Bishop, David C W Mabey, T Déirdre Hollingsworth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Parameter estimation for contact tracing in graph-based models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  4. Yaws recurrence in children at continued risk of infection.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Contact tracing - Old models and new challenges.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in the Treatment of Yaws.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louise DysonMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Michael MarksClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver M CrookMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Oliver SokanaMinistry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Anthony W SolomonClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alex BishopMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
David C W MabeyClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
T Déirdre HollingsworthMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity College London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yaws is a disabling bacterial infection found primarily in warm and humid tropical areas. The World Health Organization strategy mandates an initial round of total community treatment (TCT) with single-dose azithromycin followed either by further TCT or active case-finding and treatment of cases and their contacts (the Morges strategy). We sought to investigate the effectiveness of the Morges strategy. We employed a stochastic household model to study the transmission of infection using data collected from a pre-TCT survey conducted in the Solomon Islands. We used this model to assess the proportion of asymptomatic infections that occurred in households without active cases. This analysis indicated that targeted treatment of cases and their household contacts would miss a large fraction of asymptomatic infections (65%-100%). This fraction was actually higher at lower prevalences. Even assuming that all active cases and their households were successfully treated, our analysis demonstrated that at all prevalences present in the data set, up to 90% of (active and asymptomatic) infections would not be treated under household-based contact tracing. Mapping was undertaken as part of the study "Epidemiology of Yaws in the Solomon Islands and the Impact of a Trachoma Control Programme," in September-October 2013.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCommunicable Disease ControlContact TracingFemaleHumansMaleMelanesiaModels, StatisticalYawsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID29140407
PMCPMC5888927
OpenAlexW2746069092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.