Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29139480›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2017

Position paper: The potential role of optical biopsy in the study and diagnosis of environmental enteric dysfunction.

Alex J Thompson, Michael Hughes, Salzitsa Anastasova, Laurie S Conklin, Tudor Thomas, Cadman Leggett, William A Faubion, Thomas J Miller, Peter Delaney, François Lacombe and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Gastrointestinal diagnosis using non-white light imaging capsule endoscopy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Alex J ThompsonHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Bessemer Building, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Michael HughesHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Bessemer Building, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Salzitsa AnastasovaHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Bessemer Building, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Laurie S ConklinDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children's National Health Systems, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW, Washington District of Columbia 20010, USA.
Tudor ThomasOlympus Surgical Technologies Europe, Fortran Road, Cardiff, CF3 0LT, UK.
Cadman LeggettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
William A FaubionDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Thomas J MillerGreyBird Ventures, 31 Pond View Lane, Concord, Massachusetts 01742, USA.
Peter DelaneyOptiScan, 16 Miles Street, Mulgrave, Victoria 3170, Australia.
François LacombeMauna Kea Technologies, 9 rue d'Enghien, 75010 Paris, France.
Sacha LoiseauMauna Kea Technologies, 9 rue d'Enghien, 75010 Paris, France.
Alexander MeiningDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Rebecca Richards-KortumDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Suite 1030, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Guillermo J TearneyHarvard Medical School and Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Paul KellyBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Guang-Zhong YangHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Bessemer Building, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Imperial College London · GBMauna Kea Technologies (France) · FRMayo Clinic · USBluebird Bio (United States) · USChildren's National · USHarvard University · USOlympus (United Kingdom) · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBRice University · USUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) is a disease of the small intestine affecting children and adults in low and middle income countries. Arising as a consequence of repeated infections, gut inflammation results in impaired intestinal absorptive and barrier function, leading to poor nutrient uptake and ultimately to stunting and other developmental limitations. Progress towards new biomarkers and interventions for EED is hampered by the practical and ethical difficulties of cross-validation with the gold standard of biopsy and histology. Optical biopsy techniques - which can provide minimally invasive or noninvasive alternatives to biopsy - could offer other routes to validation and could potentially be used as point-of-care tests among the general population. This Consensus Statement identifies and reviews the most promising candidate optical biopsy technologies for applications in EED, critically assesses them against criteria identified for successful deployment in developing world settings, and proposes further lines of enquiry. Importantly, many of the techniques discussed could also be adapted to monitor the impaired intestinal barrier in other settings such as IBD, autoimmune enteropathies, coeliac disease, graft-versus-host disease, small intestinal transplantation or critical care.

Indexed as

BiopsyEnvironmental ExposureHumansIntestinal DiseasesIntestine, SmallMalabsorption SyndromesOptical ImagingPhotoacoustic TechniquesSpectrometry, FluorescenceTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID29139480
OpenAlexW2771024714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.