Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29139377›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2017

Laboratory colonization and mass rearing of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae).

Phillip Lawyer, Mireille Killick-Kendrick, Tobin Rowland, Edgar Rowton, Petr Volf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. LABCG1 AffectsACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Isolation ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cryptic Sex inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Phillip LawyerMonte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, 2103 MLBM, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Mireille Killick-Kendrick2 Place du Temple, 30440 Sumène, France.
Tobin RowlandDivision of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Silver Spring, MD 84910, USA.
Edgar RowtonDivision of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Silver Spring, MD 84910, USA.
Petr VolfDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, 128 44, Praha, Czech Republic.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USBrigham Young University · USCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory colonies of phlebotomine sand flies are necessary for experimental study of their biology, behaviour and mutual relations with disease agents and for testing new methods of vector control. They are indispensable in genetic studies and controlled observations on the physiology and behaviour of sand flies, neglected subjects of high priority. Colonies are of particular value for screening insecticides. Colonized sand flies are used as live vector models in a diverse array of research projects, including xenodiagnosis, that are directed toward control of leishmaniasis and other sand fly-associated diseases. Historically, labour-intensive maintenance and low productivity have limited their usefulness for research, especially for species that do not adapt well to laboratory conditions. However, with growing interest in leishmaniasis research, rearing techniques have been developed and refined, and sand fly colonies have become more common, enabling many significant breakthroughs. Today, there are at least 90 colonies representing 21 distinct phlebotomine sand fly species in 35 laboratories in 18 countries worldwide. The materials and methods used by various sand fly workers differ, dictated by the availability of resources, cost or manpower constraints rather than choice. This paper is not intended as a comprehensive review but rather a discussion of methods and techniques most commonly used by researchers to initiate, establish and maintain sand fly colonies, with emphasis on the methods proven to be most effective for the species the authors have colonized. Topics discussed include collecting sand flies for colony stock, colony initiation, maintenance and mass-rearing procedures, and control of sand fly pathogens in colonies.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensCricetinaeFemaleGuinea PigsHousing, AnimalIndiaInsect VectorsMaleMiceOvipositionPsychodidaeRabbitsTransportation

Identifiers

PMID29139377
PMCPMC5687099
OpenAlexW2770746878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.