Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29139245›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2017

Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms.

Ingemar Fredriksson, Rolf B Saager, Anthony J Durkin, Tomas Strömberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vasomotion analysis of speed resolved perfusion, oxygen saturation, red blood cell tissue fraction, and vessel diameter: Novel microvascular perspectives.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingemar FredrikssonLinköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping, Sweden.
Rolf B SaagerUniversity of California, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Anthony J DurkinUniversity of California, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Tomas StrömbergLinköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Virtual Photonocs TechnologiesP41EB015890 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI VENUGOPALAN, VASAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fiber-optic probe-based instrument, designed for assessment of parameters related to microcirculation, red blood cell tissue fraction (fRBC), oxygen saturation (SO2), and speed resolved perfusion, has been evaluated using state-of-the-art tissue phantoms. The probe integrates diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) at two source-detector separations and laser Doppler flowmetry, using an inverse Monte Carlo method for identifying the parameters of a multilayered tissue model. Here, we characterize the accuracy of the DRS aspect of the instrument using (1) liquid blood phantoms containing yeast and (2) epidermis-dermis mimicking solid-layered phantoms fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane, titanium oxide, hemoglobin, and coffee. The root-mean-square (RMS) deviations for fRBC for the two liquid phantoms were 11% and 5.3%, respectively, and 11% for the solid phantoms with highest hemoglobin signatures. The RMS deviation for SO2 was 5.2% and 2.9%, respectively, for the liquid phantoms, and 2.9% for the solid phantoms. RMS deviation for the reduced scattering coefficient (μs'), for the solid phantoms was 15% (475 to 850 nm). For the liquid phantoms, the RMS deviation in average vessel diameter (D) was 1  μm. In conclusion, the skin microcirculation parameters fRBC and SO2, as well as, μs' and D are estimated with reasonable accuracy.

Indexed as

MicrocirculationDermatologyHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodOxygenPhantoms, ImagingSkinOxygendiffuse reflectance spectroscopyinverse Monte Carlomicrocirculationmultilayered tissue modeloptical phantomssampling volume

Identifiers

PMID29139245
PMCPMC5872620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.