Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29139092›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2018

Effects of Allopurinol on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Arrigo F G Cicero, Matteo Pirro, Gerald F Watts, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Maciej Banach, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endothelial Function Biomarkers in Hypertension.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Current topic of vascular function in hypertension in 2023-2024.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  10. Ethanol Extracts fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Arrigo F G CiceroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo PirroUnit of Internal Medicine, Angiology and Arteriosclerosis Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Gerald F WattsDepartment of Cardiology, Lipid Disorders Clinic, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Dimitri P MikhailidisDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maciej BanachDepartment of Hypertension, WAM University Hospital in Lodz, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego 113, Lodz, Poland.
Amirhossein SahebkarBiotechnology Research Center, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, 9177948564, Iran. sahebkara@mums.ac.ir.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PLRoyal Perth Hospital · AUThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUric acid (UA), the final product of purine catabolism, may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

aimThe aim of this meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials was to evaluate whether lowering serum UA (SUA) levels with allopurinol is associated with improved flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a validated marker of early vascular damage.

methodsA literature search was carried out from inception until 20 June 2017. Meta-analysis was performed using an inverse variance-weighted, random-effects model with standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect size estimate.

resultsMeta-analysis of data from the ten eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with 670 subjects, suggested a significant increase in FMD following allopurinol treatment (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.79%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.56, p < 0.001; I

conclusionThis meta-analysis of available RCTs suggests a significant benefit from allopurinol intake in increasing FMD in humans, independent of its effect on SUA levels.

Indexed as

AllopurinolCardiovascular DiseasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelial CellsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUric AcidVasodilationAllopurinolUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID29139092
OpenAlexW2769738617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.