ArticleHead and neck pathology2018
Diagnostic Approaches for Salivary Gland Tumors with Secretory and Microcystic Features.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of novel genetic alterations in salivary gland secretory carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secretory carcinoma (SC) of the salivary gland is a new entity that shares the unique morphologic features and cytogenetic characteristics of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene with its breast counterpart. Before identification of SC of the salivary gland, it was most frequently diagnosed as acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC). We retrospectively reviewed our own database of salivary gland tumors harboring microcystic and papillary architecture and/or secretory features that were originally diagnosed as AciCC. We selected nine cases of AciCC showing diffuse S-100 expression on immunohistochemistry (IHC). A recently diagnosed case of SC was included in the study as a reference sample. We performed IHC of S-100 and mammaglobin and ETV6 gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in all cases. Seven cases were positive for both S-100 and mammaglobin, while five of the seven (71.4%) demonstrated ETV6 gene translocation by FISH. In the cases which did not co-express either S-100 or mammaglobin on IHC, ETV6 gene rearrangement was not shown on FISH. In conclusion, if a salivary gland tumor has morphologic features of SC with co-expression of S-100 and mammaglobin, ETV6 FISH can be performed to confirm the diagnosis of SC of the salivary gland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.