Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29139062›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2018

Tools in Asthma Evaluation and Management: When and How to Use Them?

Anna Mulholland, Alana Ainsworth, Naveen Pillarisetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Asthma.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna MulhollandPediatric Respiratory Medicine, Starship Children's Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Alana AinsworthPediatric Respiratory Medicine, Starship Children's Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Naveen PillarisettiPediatric Respiratory Medicine, Starship Children's Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. naveenp@adhb.govt.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of asthma management are accurate diagnosis, prompt initiation of treatment and monitoring of disease progression to limit potential morbidity and mortality. While the diagnosis and management is largely based on history taking and clinical examination, there are an increasing number of tools available that could be used to aid diagnosis, define phenotypes, monitor progress and assess response to treatment. Tools such as the Asthma Predictive Index could help in making predictions about the possibility of asthma in childhood based on certain clinical parameters in pre-schoolers. Lung function measurements such as peak expiratory flow, spirometry, bronchodilator responsiveness, and bronchial provocation tests help establish airway obstruction and variability over time. Tools such as asthma questionnaires, lung function measurements and markers of airway inflammation could be used in combination with clinical assessments to assess ongoing asthma control. Recent advances in digital technology, which open up new frontiers in asthma management, need to be evaluated and embraced if proven to be of value. This review summarises the role of currently available tools in asthma diagnosis and management. While many of the tools are readily available in resource rich settings, it becomes more challenging when working in resource poor settings. A rational approach to the use of these tools is recommended.

Indexed as

Bronchial Provocation TestsAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsChildHumansRespiratory Function TestsSpirometrySurveys and QuestionnairesBronchodilator AgentsAsthmaChildhoodEvaluationManagementPreschoolWheeze

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.