Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29138977›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018

[Reasons for delayed and discontinued therapy in age-related macular degeneration].

M W M Wintergerst, J Bouws, J Loss, B Heimes, D Pauleikhoff, F G Holz, R P Finger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Real-world therapy and persistence of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema: a German claims data analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Adherence to anti-VEGF treatment-Considerations and practical recommendations].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. [Technical aspects of quality assurance for intravitreal injections (IVI)].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
  12. [IVOM quality assurance in Westfalen-Lippe : Structure of quality assurance and results of the pilot study Q-VERA].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M W M WintergerstUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
J BouwsAMD-Netz, Münster, Deutschland.
J LossMedizinische Soziologie, Institut für Epidemiologie und präventive Medizin, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
B HeimesSt. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
D PauleikhoffSt. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
F G HolzUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
R P FingerUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland. robert.finger@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical prerequisites for successful therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) are an early initiation and continuous monitoring; however, delays in starting therapy and non-medically indicated discontinuation of therapy are frequent, which limits therapy efficacy and, thus, visual outcomes.

objectiveTo identify the reasons for delay in therapy and non-medically indicated termination of therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients who had started a new therapy (starters) and those who independently terminated therapy (dropouts) were interviewed by telephone with a specific, standardized questionnaire. Results were summarized descriptively.

resultsA total of 100 starters and 55 dropouts were interviewed. The mean therapy delay was 22 (±28 SD) days. This was mainly due to the time until the decision to see an ophthalmologist was made. Main reasons for dropping out were: transportation issues (27%), poor general health (25%) and the assumption that there is no benefit from therapy (11%). Of the patients who dropped out 63% would have liked to continue therapy.

conclusionThere is potential for improvement in nvAMD management regarding therapy start as well as therapy maintenance. Sensitizing for initial nvAMD symptoms is important as is reduction of barriers to therapy maintenance, since most therapy dropouts would like to continue the therapy.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationAge DistributionAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGFHealthcare accessTherapy delayTherapy dropout

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.