SynthesisNeurosurgical review2019
Multiple high-grade gliomas: epidemiology, management, and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiation of high-grade glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma based on imaging heterogeneity scoring system.Neurosurgical review · 2026Trial
- Inhibition of cell surface GRP78 on brain tumors reverses drug resistance and stops cancer stem cell expansion.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Transorbital Approach for Select Recurrent and Newly Diagnosed Anteromedial Temporal Lobe Gliomas.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Review
- Cell-free and extracellular vesicle microRNAs with clinical utility for solid tumors.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- 5-ALA Assisted Surgery of Human Glioblastoma Samples Reveals an Enrichment of T Cells Expressing PD-1 and CD103 in the Intermediate and Marginal Layers.European journal of immunology · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Glioblastoma Patients and the Establishment of a Nomogram.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Unveiling a Novel Glioblastoma Deep Molecular Profiling: Insight into the Cancer Cell Differentiation-Related Mechanisms.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Different risk factors for multiple and unifocal gliomas: a comparative study of radiological, pathological and clinical characteristics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Chromatin Licensing and DNA Replication Factor 1 (CDT1) Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker Involved in the Malignant Biological Behavior of Glioma.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- BMP4 and Temozolomide Synergize in the Majority of Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cultures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Patterns of care and survival in patients with multifocal glioblastoma: A Danish cohort study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- Ursolic acid inhibits glioblastoma through suppressing TGFβ-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and angiogenesis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Deciphering Glioblastoma: Fundamental and Novel Insights into the Biology and Therapeutic Strategies of Gliomas.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- General Clinico-Pathological Characteristics in Glioblastomas in Correlation with p53 and Ki67.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2023Article
- Bevacizumab in real-life patients with recurrent glioblastoma: benefit or futility?Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Article
- Report of multiple high-grade gliomas in two patients with shared retained ATRX, wild-type IDH, losses of CDKN2A genes and alterations in the PTEN-PI3K axis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple high-grade gliomas (M-HGGs) are well--separated tumors, differentiated as multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) by their MRI features. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature examining epidemiology, clinical and radiological characteristics, management, and the overall survival from M-HGGs. According to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive review of studies published between January 1990 and January 2017 was carried out. The authors identified studies that examined the prevalence rate, clinical and radiological characteristics, treatment, and overall survival from M-HGGs in patients with HGG. Data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Finally, we systematically reviewed demographic characteristics, lesion location, and surgical and adjuvant treatments. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review. The M-HGGs prevalence rate was 19% (95% CI 13-26%) and the hazard ratio of death from M-HGGs in the HGGs population was 1.71 (95% CI 1.49-1.95, p < 0.0001). The MC prevalence rate was 6% (CI 95% 4-10%), whereas MF prevalence rate was 11% (CI 95% 6-20%) (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between MF and MC HGGs in gender, lesion location, histological type, and surgical treatment. Survival analysis of MC tumors showed that surgical resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection) is an independent predictor of improved outcome (HR 7.61 for biopsy subgroup, 95% CI 1.94-29.78, p = 0.004). The prevalence of M-HGGs is approximately 20% of HGGs. The clinical relevance of separating M-HGGs in MF and MC tumors remains questionable and its prognostic significance is unclear. When patient status and lesion characteristics make it safe and feasible, cytoreduction should be attempted in patients with M-HGGs because it improves overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.