Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29138883›Full record

ReviewCalcified tissue international2018

Hallmarks of Bone Metastasis.

Rachelle W Johnson, Larry J Suva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Calcified tissue international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Amino Acid Metabolism in Bone Metastatic Disease.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bone Tropism in Cancer Metastases.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachelle W JohnsonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Larry J SuvaDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. lsuva@cvm.tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-9757
Texas A&M University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Breast Cancer Bone MetastasisR01CA166060 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SUVA, LARRY J. · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
CHARACTERIZATION OF BREAST CANCER DORMANCY IN BONER00CA194198 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHNSON, RACHELLE W · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Characterization of breast cancer dormancy in boneK99CA194198 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, RACHELLE W · 2015 to 2015
$124k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA194198NCI NIH HHS R00 CA194198NCI NIH HHS R00CA194198NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166060NCI NIH HHS R01CA166060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer bone metastasis develops as the result of a series of complex interactions between tumor cells, bone marrow cells, and resident bone cells. The net effect of these interactions are the disruption of normal bone homeostasis, often with significantly increased osteoclast and osteoblast activity, which has provided a rational target for controlling tumor progression, with little or no emphasis on tumor eradication. Indeed, the clinical course of metastatic breast cancer is relatively long, with patients likely to experience sequential skeletal-related events (SREs), often over lengthy periods of time, even up to decades. These SREs include bone pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression, all of which may profoundly impair a patient's quality-of-life. Our understanding of the contributions of the host bone and bone marrow cells to the control of tumor progression has grown over the years, yet the focus of virtually all available treatments remains on the control of resident bone cells, primarily osteoclasts. In this perspective, our focus is to move away from the current emphasis on the control of bone cells and focus our attention on the hallmarks of bone metastatic tumor cells and how these differ from primary tumor cells and normal host cells. In our opinion, there remains a largely unmet medical need to develop and utilize therapies that impede metastatic tumor cells while sparing normal host bone and bone marrow cells. This perspective examines the impact of metastatic tumor cells on the bone microenvironment and proposes potential new directions for uncovering the important mechanisms driving metastatic progression in bone based on the hallmarks of bone metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone Marrow CellsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiceOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteolysisBreast cancerMetastasisOsteolysisPathologyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID29138883
PMCPMC5807131
OpenAlexW2769314721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.