Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29138646›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2017

The Characteristics of TCM Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Junchao Chen, Jihan Huang, Jordan V Li, Yinghua Lv, Yingchun He, Qingshan Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Use of Multiple Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junchao ChenCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1830-4494
Jihan HuangCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Jordan V LiMedical Science & Computing, LLC, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Yinghua LvCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yingchun HeCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Qingshan ZhengCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6235-8137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this review is to characterize current status of global TCM clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

methodsWe examined all the trials registered within ClinicalTrials.gov up to 25 September 2015, focusing on study interventions to identify TCM-related trials, and extracted 1,270 TCM trials from the data set.

resultsOverall, 691 (54.4%) trials were acupuncture, and 454 (35.8%) trials were herbal medicines. Differences in TCM trial intervention types were also evident among the specific therapeutic areas. Among all trials, 55.7% that were small studies enrolled <100 subjects, and only 8.7% of completed studies had reported results of trials. As for the location, the United States was second to China in conducting the most TCM trials.

conclusionThis review is the first snapshot of the landscape of TCM clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, providing the basis for treatment and prevention of diseases within TCM and offering useful information that will guide future research on TCM.

Identifiers

PMID29138646
PMCPMC5613643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.