Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29138644›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2017

Acupotomy Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fushui Liu, Fanyuan Zhou, Meimei Zhao, Ting Fang, Mei Chen, Xiaojun Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fushui LiuSchool of Moxibustion, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-0889
Fanyuan ZhouSchool of Moxibustion, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-4732
Meimei ZhaoSchool of Moxibustion, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-0028
Ting FangSchool of Moxibustion, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-987X
Mei ChenSchool of Moxibustion, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-6955
Xiaojun YanResearch Center for Differentiation and Development of TCM Basic Theory, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2485-6930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review is to assess the efficacy and safety of acupotomy therapy in chronic nonspecific neck pain.

methodsWe searched six computerised databases. Randomized controlled trials incorporating acupotomy therapy alone or combined with other conventional treatments for chronic nonspecific neck pain were included. Two reviewers screened each literature and extracted data independently according to Cochrane Reviews' Handbook (5.1). The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.3 software was applied for meta-analysis.

resultsA total of ten trials involving 433 patients were enrolled. The pooled analysis indicated that acupotomy therapy showed a significant improving short-term and long-term effect on effective rate and cure rate. Meta-analysis demonstrated that acupotomy therapy group was superior to control group in restoring cervical lordosis and debasing VAS score. The result of continuous data did not support statistical significance of acupotomy therapy in adjusting clinical symptom score. For adverse events, acupotomy group did not reveal obvious superiority compared to control group.

conclusionsAcupotomy therapy may be beneficial to chronic nonspecific neck pain patients. To strengthen supportive evidence, future, more rigorously designed clinical trials, adequate adverse events, and follow-up project are recommended.

Identifiers

PMID29138644
PMCPMC5613650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.