ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2017
Naturally Acquired Antibody Responses to a Synthetic Malaria Antigen AS202.11.
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA major challenge to malaria vaccine development is identification of protective epitopes and respective protective immune responses.
objectiveTo characterize naturally acquired Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the synthetic peptide AS202.11, a malaria vaccine candidate. METHODOLOGY: This community based cross-sectional study enrolled 320 participants aged 1 year and above. Demographic information was recorded through interviews. Detection of
resultsThe overall AS202.11 IgG seropositivity was 78.8% (73.9-82.9). Seropositivity by age categories was ≤12 years [74.3% (67.4-80.2)], 13-40 years [85.3% (76.5-91.1)], and >40 years [82.6% (68.7-91.1)]. Compared to the ≤ 12-year-old group, aORs for the other groups were 2.22 (1.14-4.32),
conclusionWe report a high degree of recognition of AS202.11 by IgG elicited by field
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.