Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29138206›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

MONITOR-IC study, a mixed methods prospective multicentre controlled cohort study assessing 5-year outcomes of ICU survivors and related healthcare costs: a study protocol.

Wytske Geense, Marieke Zegers, Hester Vermeulen, Mark van den Boogaard, Johannes van der Hoeven

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03246334 (MONITOR-IC), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03246334 recruitingnot on this map

MONITOR-IC: a Mixed Methods Multicenter Prospective Open Cohort Study Determining and Improving Long-term Outcomes of ICU Survivors

TypeobservationalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2016 to 2050Enrolled50,000ConditionsPost-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Getting valuable and valid insight in life after ICU: evaluating the representativeness of a large cohort of ICU survivors.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wytske GeenseDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke ZegersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mark van den BoogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to advances in critical care medicine, more patients survive their critical illness. However, intensive care unit (ICU) survivors often experience long-term physical, cognitive and mental problems, summarised as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), impacting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In what frequency PICS occurs, and to what extent this influences ICU survivors' HRQoL, is mostly unknown. The aims of this study are therefore to study the: (1) 5-year patient outcomes, (2) predictors for PICS, (3) ratio between HRQoL of ICU survivors and healthcare-related costs, and (4) care and support needs.

methodsThe MONITOR-IC study is a multicentre prospective controlled cohort study, carried out in ICUs in four Dutch hospitals. Patients will be included between July 2016 and July 2021 and followed for 5 years. We estimated to include 12000 ICU patients. Outcomes are the HRQoL, physical, cognitive and mental symptoms, ICU survivors' care and support needs, healthcare use and related costs. A control cohort of otherwise seriously ill patients will be assembled to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes. We will use a mixed methods design, including questionnaires, medical data from patient records, cost data from health insurance companies and interviews with patients and family members. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Insights from this study will be used to inform ICU patients and their family members about long-term consequences of ICU care, and to develop prediction and screening instruments to detect patients at risk for PICS. Subsequently, tailored interventions can be developed and implemented to prevent and mitigate long-term consequences. Additionally, insights into the ratio between HRQoL of ICU patients and related healthcare costs during 5 years after ICU admission can be used to discuss the added value of ICU care from a community perspective. The study has been approved by the research ethics committee of the Radboud University Medical Center (2016-2724). CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03246334.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHealth StatusQuality of LifeSurvivorsAnxietyCognitive DysfunctionDepressionFatigueFrailtyHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterviews as TopicMental DisordersProspective StudiesResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairescritical careintensive care unitslong-term itemspostintensive care syndromeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29138206
PMCPMC5695418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.