Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29137649›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2017

Exploring the factors affecting the implementation of tobacco and substance use interventions within a secondary school setting: a systematic review.

Gillian Waller, Tracy Finch, Emma L Giles, Dorothy Newbury-Birch

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Vaping Education in Australian High Schools: A Quality Improvement Project.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gillian WallerSchool of Health and Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Tracy FinchInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4AX, UK. tracy.finch@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8647-735X
Emma L GilesSchool of Health and Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Dorothy Newbury-BirchSchool of Health and Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this mixed-methods, systematic literature review was to develop an understanding of the factors affecting the implementation of tobacco and substance use intervention programmes in the secondary school setting using NPT as an analytical framework.

methodsA search strategy was developed that combined implementation, school and intervention search terms. Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycHINFO, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. PROSPERO was also searched for similar systematic reviews and a grey literature search of policy documents and relevant material was also conducted. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they were based in a secondary school and focused on the implementation of a tobacco or substance use programme. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were considered for inclusion. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used as a conceptual framework to identify facilitators and barriers of implementation and to structure the synthesis.

resultsInclusion criteria were met by 15 papers. The included papers were both quantitative and qualitative and focused on a range of tobacco and substance use interventions, delivered by differing providers. Key facilitating factors for implementation were positive organisational climate, adequate training and teacher's and pupil's motivation. Barriers to implementation included heavy workloads, budget cuts and lack of resources or support. Quality appraisal identified papers to be of moderate to weak quality, as papers generally lacked detail.

conclusionNPT highlighted the need for studies to extend their focus to include reflexive monitoring around appraisal and the evaluation processes of implementing new tobacco or substance use programs. Future research should also focus on employing implementation theory as a tool to facilitate bridging the gap between school health research and practice.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureAdolescentHealth EducationHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchSchoolsSmoking PreventionSubstance-Related DisordersTeacher TrainingUnited KingdomImplementationNormalisation Process TheorySecondary schoolSubstance useSystematic literature reviewTobacco

Identifiers

PMID29137649
PMCPMC5684739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.