Trial reportMedicine2017
The effects of hypervolemic infusion on microcirculation perfusion of patients during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.Critical care research and practice · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of hypervolemic infusion with different solutions on microcirculation perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Thirty-six patients were randomly divided into Ringer lactate solution [RL] group, succinylated gelatin injection [Gel] group, and hypertonic saline hydroxyethyl starch 40 injection [HS] group. Hypervolemic infusion was performed during the induction period of general anesthesia. Arterial blood-gas parameters, noninvasive hemodynamics, gastric tonometry values, and central venous pressure (CVP) were compared at baseline (T1); the end of hypervolemic infusion (T2); 5 min (T3), 15 min (T4), 30 min (T5), and 60 min (T6) during pneumoperitoneum; 5 min (T7), 15 min (T8), and 25 min (T9) after pneumoperitoneum. Patients were also grouped by age for further comparisons.The hematocrit levels of all groups after T2 decreased. The gastric mucosal-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (Pg-aCO2) started to decrease after T2 and rebounded after T5. There was no difference in the gastric mucosal perfusion when compared between 3 groups. The blood Na of HS group increased significantly after T2, then gradually restored and returned to baseline by T8. The plasma bicarbonate (HCO3) levels of RL and Gel groups elevated from T2 to T7, after which they started to decrease, but this phenomenon was not significant in HS group. In both RL and Gel groups, blood pressure has a significant fluctuation in elder patients.Hypervolemic infusion of these solutions during the induction of anesthesia can improve gastric mucosal perfusion. HS can maintain a more stable hemodynamic effect when used with caution in patients with preoperative hypernatremia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.