Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29137033›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Prognostic role of C-reactive protein in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis and literature review.

Yi Fang, Chang Xu, Peng Wu, Ling-Hao Zhang, Da-Wei Li, Jie-Hao Sun, Wen-Feng Li, Zhi-Su Liao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi FangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou Medical University Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Department of Radiochemotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chang Xu
Peng Wu
Ling-Hao Zhang
Da-Wei Li
Jie-Hao Sun
Wen-Feng Li
Zhi-Su Liao
Wenzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundC-reactive protein (CRP) has been shown to be associated with several tumors. However, its association with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is not well characterized. We performed a literature review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic relevance of elevated CRP levels in patients with NPC.

methodsA literature search for relevant studies was performed on PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated to assess the association between elevated CRP levels and survival outcomes.

resultsFive studies with a combined study population of 5215 patients with NPC were included. Pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival were 1.84 (95% CI = 1.57-2.17) and 1.81 (95% CI = 1.53-2.14), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that types of indicators and treatment before inclusion had no significant impact on the observed association.

conclusionElevated serum CRP levels in patients with NPC were associated with worse prognosis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaC-Reactive ProteinHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID29137033
PMCPMC5690726
OpenAlexW2767712258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.