Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29136122›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Local and Global Spatial Organization of Interaural Level Difference and Frequency Preferences in Auditory Cortex.

Mariangela Panniello, Andrew J King, Johannes C Dahmen, Kerry M M Walker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Learning spatial hearing via innate mechanisms.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct Neuron Types Contribute to Hybrid Auditory Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Contrast gain control in mouse auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariangela PannielloDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Andrew J KingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Johannes C DahmenDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Kerry M M WalkerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT076508AIAWellcome Trust WT108369/Z/2015/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of microelectrode recordings, fundamental questions remain about how auditory cortex represents sound-source location. Here, we used in vivo 2-photon calcium imaging to measure the sensitivity of layer II/III neurons in mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) to interaural level differences (ILDs), the principal spatial cue in this species. Although most ILD-sensitive neurons preferred ILDs favoring the contralateral ear, neurons with either midline or ipsilateral preferences were also present. An opponent-channel decoder accurately classified ILDs using the difference in responses between populations of neurons that preferred contralateral-ear-greater and ipsilateral-ear-greater stimuli. We also examined the spatial organization of binaural tuning properties across the imaged neurons with unprecedented resolution. Neurons driven exclusively by contralateral ear stimuli or by binaural stimulation occasionally formed local clusters, but their binaural categories and ILD preferences were not spatially organized on a more global scale. In contrast, the sound frequency preferences of most neurons within local cortical regions fell within a restricted frequency range, and a tonotopic gradient was observed across the cortical surface of individual mice. These results indicate that the representation of ILDs in mouse A1 is comparable to that of most other mammalian species, and appears to lack systematic or consistent spatial order.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysCalciumCalcium SignalingEarFemaleFunctional LateralityMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuronsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSound LocalizationVoltage-Sensitive Dye ImagingCalcium2-photon imagingauditory cortexbinauralILDmouse

Identifiers

PMID29136122
PMCPMC5991210
OpenAlexW2767554744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.