Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29136068›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2017

Electrokinetically operated microfluidic devices for integrated immunoaffinity monolith extraction and electrophoretic separation of preterm birth biomarkers.

Mukul Sonker, Ellen K Parker, Anna V Nielsen, Vishal Sahore, Adam T Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mukul SonkerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. atw@byu.edu.
Ellen K Parker
Anna V Nielsen
Vishal Sahore
Adam T Woolley
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

Phase-Changing Sacrificial Layer Microfluidics for Enhanced Protein AnalysisR01EB006124 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI WOOLLEY, ADAM THOMAS · 2006 to 2016
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers are often present in complex biological fluids like blood, requiring multiple, slow sample preparation steps that pose limitations in simplifying analysis. Here we report integrated immunoaffinity extraction and separation devices for analysis of preterm birth biomarkers in a human blood serum matrix. A reactive polymer monolith was used for immobilization of antibodies for selective extraction of target preterm birth biomarkers. Microfluidic immunoaffinity extraction protocols were optimized and then integrated with microchip electrophoresis for separation. Using these integrated devices, a ∼30 min analysis was carried out on low nanomolar concentrations of two preterm birth biomarkers spiked in a human serum matrix. This work is a promising step towards the development of an automated, integrated platform for determination of preterm birth risk.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, MicrochipLab-On-A-Chip DevicesPremature BirthAntibodies, ImmobilizedBiomarkersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAntibodies, ImmobilizedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29136068
PMCPMC5734996
OpenAlexW2766509457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.