Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29135979›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

A systematic review of grandparents' influence on grandchildren's cancer risk factors.

Stephanie A Chambers, Neneh Rowa-Dewar, Andrew Radley, Fiona Dobbie

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Health Outcomes of Grandparents Caring for Double Orphans in South Africa": What Are the Determinants?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Pathways to inequalities in child health.Archives of disease in childhood · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physical Activity during the School Holidays: Parent Perceptions and Practical Considerations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A ChambersMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-6242
Neneh Rowa-DewarUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrew RadleyDirectorate of Public Health, NHS Tayside, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Fiona DobbieFaculty of Heath Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBNHS Tayside · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19672Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Medical Research Council MC_PC_13027Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many lifestyle patterns are established when children are young. Research has focused on the potential role of parents as a risk factor for non communicable disease in children, but there is limited investigation of the role of other caregivers, such as grandparents. The aim of this review was to identify and synthesise evidence for any influence grandparents' care practices may have on their grandchildren's long term cancer risk factors. A systematic review was carried out with searches across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO) as well as searches of reference lists and citing articles, and Google Scholar. Search terms were based on six areas of risk that family care could potentially influence-weight, diet, physical activity, tobacco, alcohol and sun exposure. All study designs were included, as were studies that provided an indication of the interaction of grandparents with their grandchildren. Studies were excluded if grandparents were primary caregivers and if children had serious health conditions. Study quality was assessed using National Institute for Health and Care Excellence checklists. Grandparent impact was categorised as beneficial, adverse, mixed or as having no impact. Due to study heterogeneity a meta-analysis was not possible. Qualitative studies underwent a thematic synthesis of their results. Results from all included studies indicated that there was a sufficient evidence base for weight, diet, physical activity and tobacco studies to draw conclusions about grandparents' influence. One study examined alcohol and no studies examined sun exposure. Evidence indicated that, overall, grandparents had an adverse impact on their grandchildren's cancer risk factors. The theoretical work in the included studies was limited. Theoretically underpinned interventions designed to reduce these risk factors must consider grandparents' role, as well as parents', and be evaluated robustly to inform the evidence base further.

Indexed as

GrandparentsIntergenerational RelationsAgedAlcohol DrinkingBody WeightChildCigarette SmokingDietExerciseHumansLife StyleNeoplasmsRisk FactorsSunlight

Identifiers

PMID29135979
PMCPMC5685489
OpenAlexW2768859670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.