Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29135651›Full record

Trial reportJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2018

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single-Dose Tenofovir Vaginal Film and Gel Formulation (FAME 05).

Jennifer A Robinson, Mark A Marzinke, Edward J Fuchs, Rahul P Bakshi, Hans M L Spiegel, Jenell S Coleman, Lisa C Rohan, Craig W Hendrix

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Quantitative Disintegration Method for Polymeric Films.Journal of pharmaceutical innovation · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A RobinsonMedicine (Clinical Pharmacology).
Mark A MarzinkeMedicine (Clinical Pharmacology).
Edward J FuchsMedicine (Clinical Pharmacology).
Rahul P BakshiMedicine (Clinical Pharmacology).
Hans M L SpiegelKelly Government Solutions, Contractor to Division of AIDS, PMPRB/Prevention Sciences Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, Rockville, MD.
Jenell S Coleman
Lisa C RohanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Craig W HendrixMedicine (Clinical Pharmacology).
Johns Hopkins University · USKelly Services (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Pharmaceutical and Regulatory CoreU19AI082639 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI FRIEND, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$13.0M
Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32GM066691 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Michael Ippolito · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800014CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082639NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough preexposure prophylaxis with oral tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine reduces HIV acquisition rates, poor adherence to and acceptability of daily vaginal gels have led to development of vaginal film formulations to improve adherence and, potentially, to enable episodic use. STUDY

designIn this 2-arm, cross-over study of a fast-dissolving tenofovir film (40 mg) compared with a previously studied semisolid tenofovir 1% gel (40 mg), 10 healthy women received a single vaginal dose of each study product. Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and antiviral assessments were performed over 1 week after dose.

resultsNine of 10 participants experienced mild to moderate adverse effects, similar between products, with no severe adverse events or events attributed to study products. TFV concentrations after film dosing exceeded concentrations after gel dosing in plasma between 8 and 24 hours (P ≤ 0.02). TFV concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid and both TFV and TFV diphosphate concentrations in cervical tissue homogenates were higher after film dosing (all P values < 0.04). The differences ranged from median (interquartile range) 2.9-fold (1.1, 9.0; midvaginal cervicovaginal fluid) to 4.4-fold (2.9, 7.7; plasma). Neither film nor gel demonstrated reduced cervical tissue biopsy infectivity after ex vivo HIV challenge.

conclusionSingle-dose tenofovir film demonstrated consistently higher concentrations in plasma and cervicovaginal samples when compared with gel during the first day after dosing. Single-dose cervical tissue TFV-diphosphate concentrations at 5 hours exceeded steady-state concentrations previously reported with daily oral Truvada dosing. Tenofovir film may provide an alternative to tenofovir oral and gel formulations. Clinical efficacy remains to be tested.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCervix UteriChemopreventionCross-Over StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPlasmaPre-Exposure ProphylaxisTenofovirTime FactorsVaginaVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovirVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID29135651
PMCPMC5821271
OpenAlexW2767462021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.